Are women "lab rats" in COVID shot experiments?
Rochelle Walensky, Director of the CDC
Women under age 50 and those who are pregnant are at “high risk”.
Of having serious side effects from vaccines, including the COVID-19 shot.
According to the press releases and studies from the:
CDC (Centers for Disease Control)
FDA (Federal Drug Administration)
NIH (National Institute of Health)
Yet they recommend that all women get the COVID-19 shot.
Without consulting their doctor.
It is, however, recommended in the above video.
Why is a consultation with one’s family doctor absent in CDC press releases and studies?
Because:
the federal government has replaced one’s doctor with Obamacare on Jan. 28th
psych drugs in the drinking water may be working to get people to take vaccines
billions of dollars for pro-vaccine propaganda may be succeeding
Have women become lab rats for the drugmakers?
Here are the sources from:
Wednesday
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html
Tuesday
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafepregnancyregistry.html
June 17th
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983#article_references
June 12th
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html
May 6th
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/JJUpdate.html
April 21st
April 13th
According to their caption from Tuesday’s release (above), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) said over 128,000 pregnant women have had the COVID-19 shot.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafepregnancyregistry.html
Yet, the CDC said their data on pregnant women are:
insufficient
preliminary
inconclusive
Then how can they conclude they are safe for pregnant women?
Their data said 14% of pregnant women have stillbirths from COVID-19 shots.
But it is nothing to worry about since the results are the same for pregnant women before COVID-19.
Then why should any pregnant woman get vaccinated for anything?
Yet, when six persons developed blood clots out of 6.8 million doses of a particular brand of COVID-19 vaccine, the FDA stopped it.
Then started it back up on May 6th.
And vouched for it as safe.
As if nothing had happened.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/JJUpdate.html
Even though the CDC said:
“Reports of adverse events following the use of J&J/Janssen vaccine suggest an increased risk of a rare adverse event called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS). Nearly all reports of this serious condition, which involves blood clots with low platelets, have been in adult women younger than 50 years old.”
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/JJUpdate.html
Where is the data the CDC based its opinion on?
Their data is “unavailable”.
Even though it is a public record.
According to the CDC’s “Data Sharing Statement” imagined below:
The source is a CDC study dated April 21st.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983/suppl_file/nejmoa2104983_data-sharing.pdf
Who are the people who wrote the above reports?
They are imaged and listed here with their “affiliations”:
Editor’s note
China has had access to all the data at the CDC since 1999.
BGI, their state-owned company, sells it.
BGI has a database of 5,733,038 medical records which includes over a million medical records of pregnant women plus their DNA.
https://www.ggbn.org/ggbn_portal/
At least one of the researchers who helped write the CDC report said his wife owned stocks in two of the COVID-19 vaccine companies.
Anyone else?
Who is checking?
And what happens if there is a conflict of interest?
https://www.bioethics.nih.gov/people/index.shtml
Christine Grady, RN, Ph.D., and her husband, Dr. Anthony Fauci (left). She heads the Dept. of Bioethics at NIH (National Institute of Health).
Christine Grady, the wife of Dr. Anthony Fauci, is in charge of Ethics for the CDC and determines who violates them.
She is in favor of putting psych drugs in drinking water to get people to take vaccines.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983/suppl_file/nejmoa2104983_appendix.pdf
Are men being targeted as lab rats too?
Is their data also insufficient, inconclusive, and preliminary?
Or is it being intentionally withheld because more health problems have surfaced from vaccinated people compared to the ones who have refused it?
Who else has access to CDC vaccination records?
What is stopping anyone from hacking them?
Tips from Stephanie Jackson and Meg Mundy in the U.S.; Pete Ross in Tel Aviv, Israel; and Christoph Kirchner in Germany.
Other sources
Tracking your medical history without consent through your cell phone.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2106836
Updated July 7th at 11:01 p.m.
